<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Omelets Shouldn&#8217;t have Breasts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://earthwormenvy.wordpress.com/2007/03/23/omelets-shouldnt-have-breasts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://earthwormenvy.wordpress.com/2007/03/23/omelets-shouldnt-have-breasts/</link>
	<description>Travel tales, video podcasts, poetry, omelet reviews and sustainability.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 23:38:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jamie Falconer</title>
		<link>http://earthwormenvy.wordpress.com/2007/03/23/omelets-shouldnt-have-breasts/#comment-7867</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Falconer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 23:18:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earthwormenvy.wordpress.com/2007/03/23/omelets-shouldnt-have-breasts/#comment-7867</guid>
		<description>Innocence transcends into beauty. A moment caught. Picturesque.  Feelings are felt out (though not to be touched) accordingly.  Generic of sort.  Static we are not.  But dynamic we are cuffed.  Who is it that says?  Only that we may stand strong in what is our intentions.  Thoughts we do not control.  Where the mind can go.  Who is it that follows? And why is the follower following?  Humanity the cycle.  A infant feeds on the breast.  Sex is evolution.  I would like the revolving omelet please.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Innocence transcends into beauty. A moment caught. Picturesque.  Feelings are felt out (though not to be touched) accordingly.  Generic of sort.  Static we are not.  But dynamic we are cuffed.  Who is it that says?  Only that we may stand strong in what is our intentions.  Thoughts we do not control.  Where the mind can go.  Who is it that follows? And why is the follower following?  Humanity the cycle.  A infant feeds on the breast.  Sex is evolution.  I would like the revolving omelet please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: e</title>
		<link>http://earthwormenvy.wordpress.com/2007/03/23/omelets-shouldnt-have-breasts/#comment-138</link>
		<dc:creator>e</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2007 14:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earthwormenvy.wordpress.com/2007/03/23/omelets-shouldnt-have-breasts/#comment-138</guid>
		<description>Ha! Sorry, but I couldn&#039;t stop laughing when you likened a cat next to omelet as a precursor to  having a cat inside of your omelet. 

As for your question at the end, about pre-pubescent appearances portrayed in adult women, it&#039;s pretty typical of what we expect of women. We should always try to be young and beautiful because old and salty women are no longer useful or desireable in our modern society. It&#039;s truly ironic that we&#039;re not supposed to see children or adolescents as sexual creatures, yet we pull some pre-pubescent characteristics from that time of life and attempt to replicate them as adults. If you want to read more about this, look to the sociological literature on sexuality and gender, especially Foucault.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha! Sorry, but I couldn&#8217;t stop laughing when you likened a cat next to omelet as a precursor to  having a cat inside of your omelet. </p>
<p>As for your question at the end, about pre-pubescent appearances portrayed in adult women, it&#8217;s pretty typical of what we expect of women. We should always try to be young and beautiful because old and salty women are no longer useful or desireable in our modern society. It&#8217;s truly ironic that we&#8217;re not supposed to see children or adolescents as sexual creatures, yet we pull some pre-pubescent characteristics from that time of life and attempt to replicate them as adults. If you want to read more about this, look to the sociological literature on sexuality and gender, especially Foucault.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
